 |
FILE - This Dec. 16, 2013 file photo, shows the expansive parking lot at the base village at Squaw Valley in Olympic Valley, Calif. Environmentalists have lost their latest legal bid to block a major redevelopment project at a Lake Tahoe-area ski resort that hosted the 1960 Winter Olympics. Placer County Superior Court Judge Michael W. Jones on Aug. 13, 2018, rejected Sierra Watch’s claims that the expansion of the Village at Squaw Valley would violate the California Environmental Quality Act. (Tim Dunn/The Reno Gazette-Journal via AP, File) |
Associated Press
RENO, Nev.
Environmentalists have lost their latest legal bid to block a major redevelopment project at a Lake Tahoe-area ski resort that hosted the 1960 Winter Olympics.
Placer County Superior Court Judge Michael W. Jones rejected Sierra Watch’s claims this week that the expansion of the Village at Squaw Valley would violate the California Environmental Quality Act.
He ruled in favor of Squaw Valley Real Estate and Placer County’s approval in November 2016 of the project’s Environmental Impact Report that the opponents said was inadequate.
[post_ads]The project would add about 1,500 lodging units, an indoor recreation area and commercial space on about 93 acres (38 hectares) of mostly developed land in Olympic Valley between Truckee and Tahoe City, California. It also would add thousands of additional vehicles to the roads in and around the valley.
“The court’s unequivocal ruling in favor of Placer County demonstrates that Sierra Watch’s claims were false, there was no CEQA violation as it relates to the Village at Squaw Valley redevelopment plan,” said Whit Manley, a lawyer for Squaw Valley Real Estate and Squaw Valley Ski Holdings.
“Sierra Watch employed false and inflated claims to divide and damage the broader Squaw Alpine community,” added Ron Cohen, president and COO of Squaw Valley Ski Holdings.
Judge Jones ruled Aug. 13 the project is outside the Tahoe Basin, rejecting Sierra Watch’s claims that it must be evaluated against development standards inside the basin. He concluded that the environmental assessment adequately assessed traffic, emergency evacuation, climate change and noise impacts.
Sierra Watch leaders say they intend to appeal.
“This setback in our Squaw CEQA case is temporary; our commitment to the Sierra is timeless,” the group said on its web site.
